MPFST's canonical reference is the "MPFST Publication Manuscript (v10)". Earlier site material that framed MPFST around a mu–gamma–H coherence meter is preserved for transparency but is now archived as legacy and under reevaluation.
Canonical replication
Recommended workflows for testing MPFST using the canonical gate definition (meltdown threshold + meltdownFrac). Older protocols that compute mu, gamma, H and mℓ are preserved as legacy proxies and are not the canonical definition of coherence in MPFST.
Goal: derive the canonical gate state directly from simulated fields. Report all parameter files and solver settings; use the same gate definition across runs.
M(x,t) = u4(x,t) + u5(x,t) + u6(x,t) + u7(x,t) + u8(x,t) + d(x,t)
partial_meltdownFrac(t) = fraction of domain where M(x,t) > 0.5*Mth
full_meltdownFrac(t) = fraction of domain where M(x,t) > 0.8*Mth
Because u4..u8 and d are latent model fields, experimental data should use an explicit proxy variable S(t) designed to track "synergy amplitude" in a modality-appropriate way. Requirements vary by modality (EEG/MEG/LFP/optics/mechanics); deviations are reportable parameters, not failures.
MPFST is intended to be evaluated by independent teams using transparent pipelines, structured nulls, and explicit preregistration where possible. Code outputs are test generators, not empirical proof. HPC tooling assists exploration of the PDE system but is not a magic predictor.
Modality-specific defaults can be adapted; changes should be logged and treated as parameters for comparison, not as protocol breaks.
The prior mu–gamma–H experimental protocol is archived for transparency and historical reproducibility. It is under reevaluation relative to the canonical meltdownFrac gate and should be treated as an observational proxy, not the definition of coherence.
View the legacy mu–gamma–H protocol